Need help choosing the right code?
Ask CasePilot about procedures, modifiers, bundling, and coding guidance.
Try CasePilotAutologous reconstruction revision qualifies under 19380 when the surgeon performs significant tissue removal and/or re-advances or re-insets the flap. Common clinical drivers include excess flap fullness, contour irregularities, breast asymmetry relative to the contralateral side, fat necrosis within the flap, and partial flap volume loss. Radiation-induced fibrosis or deformity and weight-change-driven size discrepancy are also accepted indications. Either element alone, significant tissue removal or flap re-advancement, may qualify if the documentation supports that the revision substantially altered the breast mound.
Implant-based reconstruction revision qualifies when the surgeon performs significant capsular revision combined with soft tissue excision. Both components must be present. Typical scenarios include Baker Grade III or IV capsular contracture accompanied by skin or soft tissue excision, implant malposition requiring capsular manipulation plus tissue work, and radiation-related deformity of the implant pocket with associated soft tissue revision.
The "significant" threshold in the descriptor is the operative standard. Minor liposuction, isolated scar revision, or limited capsulotomy without accompanying soft tissue excision do not clear the bar for 19380. If a limited procedure has its own defined CPT code (such as a scar revision), the more specific code governs. For autologous cases, liposuction alone to reduce flap fullness may qualify as part of a 19380 procedure when it is performed as the primary revisional technique and substantially alters the breast mound; the operative note should reflect this explicitly.
Performed exclusively by plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Typically billed in the hospital outpatient (OPPS) or ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting under general anesthesia. 19380 carries an ASC payment indicator confirming it is on the covered ASC surgical procedure list, with payment based on OPPS relative payment weight. Hospital outpatient claims are paid through a comprehensive APC.
| Code | Description | When to Use Instead |
|---|---|---|
| 19380 | Revision of reconstructed breast: significant tissue removal/flap re-advancement (autologous) OR significant capsular revision combined with soft tissue excision (implant-based) | Primary code for substantial revision meeting either qualifying pathway |
| 19370 | Revision of peri-implant capsule including capsulotomy, capsulorrhaphy, and/or partial capsulectomy | Implant-based cases where only capsular revision is performed, without significant soft tissue excision |
| 19371 | Peri-implant capsulectomy, complete, including removal of all intracapsular contents | Complete capsulectomy without accompanying significant soft tissue excision |
| 19342 | Insertion or replacement of breast implant on separate day from mastectomy | Implant placement or exchange when no qualifying capsular/soft tissue revision meeting 19380 criteria is performed; may be separately reportable alongside 19380 if both are performed |
| 19350 | Nipple/areola reconstruction | Reconstruction of nipple or areola; distinct procedure not bundled with 19380; reportable the same day with modifier -51 |
| 15771 | Autologous fat grafting to trunk/breasts, 50 cc or less | Fat grafting for contour enhancement as a standalone or adjunct procedure; may be separately reportable alongside 19380 with modifier -51, pending NCCI verification |
The critical differentiator: the two-part test for implant-based revision. Auditors specifically look for whether soft tissue excision is documented alongside capsular work. When only the capsule is addressed, 19370 or 19371 is the correct choice regardless of capsular revision complexity.
Decision flowchart for implant-based breast revision:
flowchart TD
A[Implant-based reconstruction revision] --> B{Capsular revision performed?}
B -- No --> C[Report other appropriate code]
B -- Yes --> D{Significant soft tissue excision also performed?}
D -- No --> E[19370 or 19371\nCapsule-only revision]
D -- Yes --> F[19380\nCombined capsular + soft tissue revision]
| Modifier | Indication | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| -50 | Both reconstructed breasts revised same session | Triggers 150% bilateral payment adjustment per MPFS bilateral surgery indicator 1; some MACs prefer -LT/-RT instead |
| -LT / -RT | Single-side revision or bilateral split billing | Alternative to -50; verify MAC and payer preference |
| -58 | Staged revision during 90-day global period of original reconstruction | Use when revision was anticipated and planned at time of original procedure (e.g., second-phase revision following tissue expander exchange) |
| -78 | Unplanned return to OR during global period | Use for unplanned revision to address a complication such as hematoma or flap contour problem requiring emergent return to OR |
| -79 | Unrelated procedure during global period | Use if 19380 falls within the global of an unrelated surgery, not the original reconstruction |
| -51 | Secondary procedure on same date | Apply to lower-RVU procedures when 19380 is the primary service; used with 15771, 19350, etc. |
| -22 | Significantly increased procedural services | When revision complexity substantially exceeds the typical; requires detailed supporting documentation; may trigger payer review |
MUE for 19380 is 1. One unit covers the entire revision of one breast. For bilateral revisions, the service is reported as 19380-50 (one line) or as two separate lines with -RT and -LT, depending on payer instructions. Medicare and most MACs have a preference; verify before submission.
19370 and 19371 bundle into 19380 when performed on the same breast at the same session. Capsular work performed as part of a combined capsule and soft tissue revision is a component of 19380; do not separately report capsule-only codes alongside it. Verification against current CMS NCCI PTP tables is required before submission, as NCCI edits are updated quarterly.
19342 (implant replacement) and fat grafting codes 15771 and 15772 may be separately reportable when performed as distinct additional procedures, but NCCI PTP edit verification is required for each pairing. 19350 (nipple/areola reconstruction) is not bundled with 19380 and may be reported on the same date with modifier -51.
19380 carries a 90-day global period (major surgery). Pre-operative visits on the day before or day of surgery and post-operative follow-up within 90 days are included in the global payment. Modifiers -58, -78, or -79 are the mechanism to obtain separate payment for related or unrelated surgical procedures within the global window.
The operative report must establish:
Auditors flag 19380 claims when:
For Medicare, breast reconstruction revision following mastectomy is classified as reconstructive, not cosmetic. The documentation must establish that the reconstruction follows treatment for disease, trauma, or congenital deformity. MAC-level LCDs govern coverage criteria; no national NCD covers breast reconstruction. Coders should verify the active LCD applicable to their jurisdiction via the CMS Medicare Coverage Database [3].
19380 is an active physician service code (PC/TC indicator 0) with a 90-day global period. The MPFS bilateral surgery indicator is 1, confirming 150% payment for bilateral procedures. Assistant surgeon payment is subject to statutory restriction (indicator 1); documentation supporting assistant surgeon necessity is required and payment is not automatic. Co-surgeons and team surgery are not permitted (indicators 0).
The code is payable in the ASC setting (on the ASC list since CY 2007, payment based on OPPS relative payment weight) and in the hospital outpatient setting through a comprehensive APC. No national NCD exists; coverage is MAC-determined via local LCDs [3].
CMS requires the medical record to support the reconstructive nature of the procedure when the original mastectomy was performed for disease treatment, consistent with the WHCRA [4].
WHCRA [4] requires that any group health plan covering mastectomy must also cover all stages of reconstruction including revision. Commercial payers may impose prior authorization requirements for revision surgery, particularly for aesthetic revision following cancer reconstruction. Diagnosis code selection matters: submitting a cosmetic diagnosis when the reconstruction is post-mastectomy may trigger denial even when WHCRA mandates coverage. Use Z42.1, N65.1, or T85.44XA as appropriate to reflect the reconstructive context.
Some commercial payers impose their own documentation requirements, including preoperative photographs and detailed prior authorization documentation specifying the type of revision and its clinical necessity.
No state-specific guidance was available in the research document. WHCRA applies to group health plans but not to Medicaid. Medicaid coverage of breast reconstruction revision varies by state. Managed Medicaid plans may impose prior authorization requirements or limit coverage to post-mastectomy reconstruction. Verify applicable state plan and managed care plan policies before billing.
Denial: Bundled into global period Without a global period modifier, any related surgical service during the 90-day post-operative window of the original reconstruction is automatically bundled by the payer's claims processing system. The claim will be denied or zero-paid. Prevention: Apply -58 for staged/planned revision, -78 for unplanned return to OR for a related complication, or -79 for an unrelated procedure. Document the modifier rationale in the record. Confirm that the original procedure date and the revision date are submitted correctly to enable global period calculation.
Denial: Upcoding / Code substitution to 19370 or 19371 Payers and RAC auditors reviewing implant-based revision claims will downcode 19380 to 19370 or 19371 when the operative report does not document soft tissue excision alongside capsular revision. Prevention: The operative report must explicitly document the soft tissue excision component as a distinct element of the procedure, separate from the capsular work. If only capsular revision was performed, use 19370 or 19371 prospectively to avoid recoupment.
Denial: Insufficient documentation of significance Vague operative language ("revised breast," "improved contour") without quantifying tissue removal or detailing the extent of flap work fails medical necessity review. Prevention: The operative note should document the volume of tissue excised or the specific anatomical work performed on the flap (re-inset to new position, amount advanced, technique). For implant cases, describe the capsular findings and the specific soft tissue excised.
Denial: Missing bilateral modifier Bilateral revision billed without modifier -50 (or -LT/-RT) results in payment for only one side at standard rate, not the 150% bilateral adjustment. Prevention: When both reconstructed breasts are revised in the same session, confirm modifier -50 or paired -LT/-RT is appended. Verify MAC and payer preference for -50 versus -LT/-RT to avoid secondary billing edits.
Denial: NCCI bundling of capsule codes Reporting 19370 or 19371 alongside 19380 for the same breast on the same date will trigger an NCCI PTP edit denial. Prevention: When 19380 is supported by the documentation, do not separately report 19370 or 19371 for the same breast. Capsular work is a component of 19380 in combined procedures. Appeals based on modifier -59 or XS for distinct procedures are unlikely to succeed when the capsular work is part of the same revision.
Scenario 1: Autologous flap revision, outside global period
A patient with a DIEP flap reconstruction performed 8 months ago presents with excess flap fullness in the lower pole and asymmetry relative to the contralateral breast. The surgeon excises a wedge of excess flap tissue and re-advances the inferior flap margin to improve shape and projection.
Correct coding: 19380 + N65.1 (disproportion of reconstructed breast). No global modifier required; 8 months is outside the 90-day global period of the original reconstruction.
Why: Significant tissue excision combined with flap re-advancement meets both autologous revision elements in the 19380 descriptor. N65.1 reflects the documented asymmetry indication.
Scenario 2: Implant-based revision with capsular contracture, staged during global period
A patient underwent tissue expander-to-implant exchange (19342) 6 weeks ago. At that time, a second-stage revision of lower pole contour was planned and documented in the consent and operative report. The surgeon returns to OR for significant capsulotomy and removal of inferior capsular tissue combined with excision of excess lower pole skin.
Correct coding: 19380-58 + Z42.1 (encounter for breast reconstruction following mastectomy).
Why: The procedure falls within the 90-day global of 19342 and was planned, requiring modifier -58 to allow separate payment. Both the capsular revision and soft tissue excision are documented, satisfying the implant-based pathway for 19380.
Scenario 3: Capsular contracture, capsule only — correct downselection
A patient with implant-based reconstruction presents with Baker Grade III capsular contracture. The surgeon performs partial capsulectomy to release the contracture. No skin or soft tissue is excised.
Correct coding: 19370 + T85.44XA (capsular contracture of breast implant, initial encounter).
Why: Only capsular revision was performed. The 19380 parenthetical requires BOTH significant capsular revision AND soft tissue excision for implant-based cases. Reporting 19380 here would constitute upcoding; 19370 correctly captures the capsule-only work.
Scenario 4: Bilateral autologous revision with fat grafting
A patient with bilateral latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction presents with bilateral contour depressions on the superior poles. The surgeon re-advances the flap bilaterally to correct shape and separately performs 45 cc of autologous fat grafting to the superior pole depressions.
Correct coding: 19380-50 + 15771-51 + N65.1. Alternatively, 19380-RT and 19380-LT per MAC preference.
Why: Bilateral flap re-advancement qualifies for 19380-50 with the 150% bilateral adjustment. Fat grafting is a distinct additional procedure reportable separately with -51; verify current NCCI PTP edits between 19380 and 15771 before submission.
© Copyright 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Revision of a reconstructed breast involves surgical procedures aimed at correcting or enhancing the aesthetic appearance of a breast that has previously undergone reconstruction. This type of surgery is often necessary to achieve the desired final result, whether the initial reconstruction was performed using autologous tissue (flaps) or implants. The primary goals of revision surgery include correcting issues related to size, shape, and position of the breast, as well as addressing complications such as infection, necrosis, or capsular contracture. In cases of autologous tissue reconstruction, common reasons for revision include correcting fullness of the flap, contour irregularities, or asymmetry between the breasts. The specific approach to revision surgery is tailored to the individual patient, taking into account the type of reconstruction that was initially performed, the specific aesthetic corrections required, and any current symptoms or complications. Surgical incisions are typically made over existing scars or in the natural crease of the breast to minimize visible scarring. For implant-based reconstructions, the procedure may involve exposing the capsule surrounding the implant, which can be revised by removing excess scar tissue or calcifications, releasing any adhesions, and addressing skin or scar issues. Additionally, the implant may be repositioned or replaced with a different size, shape, or type, which would be reported separately. In the case of flap revisions, the surgeon may excise excess flap tissue, perform liposuction to reduce fullness, re-advance or reset the flap's position, or use grafts from other donor sites to reshape the flap. The introduction of additional autologous fat may also be performed to enhance volume or correct contouring issues. After the breast mound has been reshaped and contoured to the desired aesthetic, drains may be placed as necessary, and the skin is meticulously closed in layers to promote optimal healing.
© Copyright 2026 Coding Ahead. All rights reserved.
The revision of a reconstructed breast is indicated for various reasons, primarily aimed at correcting aesthetic or functional issues that may arise after the initial reconstruction. The following conditions may warrant this procedure:
The procedure for revising a reconstructed breast involves several detailed steps, which may vary based on the specific issues being addressed and the type of reconstruction previously performed. The following procedural steps outline the typical approach:
Post-procedure care following breast revision surgery is crucial for recovery and optimal outcomes. Patients are typically monitored for any immediate complications and provided with instructions for care at home. This may include managing drains if placed, monitoring for signs of infection, and following specific guidelines for activity restrictions. Patients are advised to avoid strenuous activities and heavy lifting during the initial recovery phase. Follow-up appointments are essential to assess healing, remove any drains, and evaluate the aesthetic results of the surgery. The expected recovery time may vary based on the extent of the procedure and individual healing responses, but patients should be prepared for a gradual return to normal activities.
| Short Descr | REVJ RECONSTRUCTED BREAST | Medium Descr | REVISION OF RECONSTRUCTED BREAST | Long Descr | Revision of reconstructed breast (eg, significant removal of tissue, re-advancement and/or re-inset of flaps in autologous reconstruction or significant capsular revision combined with soft tissue excision in implant-based reconstruction) | Status Code | Active Code | Global Days | 090 - Major Surgery | PC/TC Indicator (26, TC) | 0 - Physician Service Code | Multiple Procedures (51) | 2 - Standard payment adjustment rules for multiple procedures apply. | Bilateral Surgery (50) | 1 - 150% payment adjustment for bilateral procedures applies. | Physician Supervisions | 09 - Concept does not apply. | Assistant Surgeon (80, 82) | 1 - Statutory payment restriction for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure... | Co-Surgeons (62) | 0 - Co-surgeons not permitted for this procedure. | Team Surgery (66) | 0 - Team surgeons not permitted for this procedure. | Diagnostic Imaging Family | 99 - Concept Does Not Apply | APC Status Indicator | Hospital Part B services paid through a comprehensive APC | ASC Payment Indicator | Surgical procedure on ASC list in CY 2007; payment based on OPPS relative payment weight. | Type of Service (TOS) | 2 - Surgery | Berenson-Eggers TOS (BETOS) | P1A - Major procedure - breast | MUE | 1 | CCS Clinical Classification | 175 - Other OR therapeutic procedures on skin and breast |
| 50 | Bilateral procedure: unless otherwise identified in the listings, bilateral procedures that are performed at the same session, should be identified by adding modifier 50 to the appropriate 5 digit code. note: this modifier should not be appended to designated "add-on" codes (see appendix d). | LT | Left side (used to identify procedures performed on the left side of the body) | RT | Right side (used to identify procedures performed on the right side of the body) | 59 | Distinct procedural service: under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or independent from other non-e/m services performed on the same day. modifier 59 is used to identify procedures/services, other than e/m services, that are not normally reported together, but are appropriate under the circumstances. documentation must support a different session, different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision, separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual. however, when another already established modifier is appropriate it should be used rather than modifier 59. only if no more descriptive modifier is available, and the use of modifier 59 best explains the circumstances, should modifier 59 be used. note: modifier 59 should not be appended to an e/m service. to report a separate and distinct e/m service with a non-e/m service performed on the same date, see modifier 25. | 51 | Multiple procedures: when multiple procedures, other than e/m services, physical medicine and rehabilitation services or provision of supplies (eg, vaccines), are performed at the same session by the same individual, the primary procedure or service may be reported as listed. the additional procedure(s) or service(s) may be identified by appending modifier 51 to the additional procedure or service code(s). note: this modifier should not be appended to designated "add-on" codes (see appendix d). | GC | This service has been performed in part by a resident under the direction of a teaching physician | SG | Ambulatory surgical center (asc) facility service | AS | Physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist services for assistant at surgery | 22 | Increased procedural services: when the work required to provide a service is substantially greater than typically required, it may be identified by adding modifier 22 to the usual procedure code. documentation must support the substantial additional work and the reason for the additional work (ie, increased intensity, time, technical difficulty of procedure, severity of patient's condition, physical and mental effort required). note: this modifier should not be appended to an e/m service. | 52 | Reduced services: under certain circumstances a service or procedure is partially reduced or eliminated at the discretion of the physician or other qualified health care professional. under these circumstances the service provided can be identified by its usual procedure number and the addition of modifier 52, signifying that the service is reduced. this provides a means of reporting reduced services without disturbing the identification of the basic service. note: for hospital outpatient reporting of a previously scheduled procedure/service that is partially reduced or cancelled as a result of extenuating circumstances or those that threaten the well-being of the patient prior to or after administration of anesthesia, see modifiers 73 and 74 (see modifiers approved for asc hospital outpatient use). | 54 | Surgical care only: when 1 physician or other qualified health care professional performs a surgical procedure and another provides preoperative and/or postoperative management, surgical services may be identified by adding modifier 54 to the usual procedure number. | 58 | Staged or related procedure or service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during the postoperative period: it may be necessary to indicate that the performance of a procedure or service during the postoperative period was: (a) planned or anticipated (staged); (b) more extensive than the original procedure; or (c) for therapy following a surgical procedure. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 58 to the staged or related procedure. note: for treatment of a problem that requires a return to the operating/procedure room (eg, unanticipated clinical condition), see modifier 78. | 76 | Repeat procedure or service by same physician or other qualified health care professional: it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was repeated by the same physician or other qualified health care professional subsequent to the original procedure or service. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 76 to the repeated procedure or service. note: this modifier should not be appended to an e/m service. | 78 | Unplanned return to the operating/procedure room by the same physician or other qualified health care professional following initial procedure for a related procedure during the postoperative period: it may be necessary to indicate that another procedure was performed during the postoperative period of the initial procedure (unplanned procedure following initial procedure). when this procedure is related to the first, and requires the use of an operating/procedure room, it may be reported by adding modifier 78 to the related procedure. (for repeat procedures, see modifier 76.) | 79 | Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during the postoperative period: the individual may need to indicate that the performance of a procedure or service during the postoperative period was unrelated to the original procedure. this circumstance may be reported by using modifier 79. (for repeat procedures on the same day, see modifier 76.) | 80 | Assistant surgeon: surgical assistant services may be identified by adding modifier 80 to the usual procedure number(s). | 82 | Assistant surgeon (when qualified resident surgeon not available): the unavailability of a qualified resident surgeon is a prerequisite for use of modifier 82 appended to the usual procedure code number(s). | AQ | Physician providing a service in an unlisted health professional shortage area (hpsa) | GA | Waiver of liability statement issued as required by payer policy, individual case | GJ | "opt out" physician or practitioner emergency or urgent service | GZ | Item or service expected to be denied as not reasonable and necessary | XS | Separate structure, a service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure | XU | Unusual non-overlapping service, the use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service |
|
Date
|
Action
|
Notes
|
|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-01 | Changed | Code changed. |
| Pre-1990 | Added | Code added. |
Get instant expert-level medical coding assistance.