Need help choosing the right code?
Ask CasePilot about procedures, modifiers, bundling, and coding guidance.
Try CasePilotClinical indications driving 93971 include any scenario where venous evaluation of an extremity is clinically warranted but the scope does not constitute a complete bilateral study. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria (2023) rates duplex ultrasound as "Usually Appropriate" as the first-line modality for suspected lower-extremity DVT [7]. Common clinical triggers:
Scope boundaries define both uses of the code. "Unilateral" means a complete evaluation of one limb: all relevant venous segments for that extremity type (e.g., CFV, femoral, popliteal, GSV, tibials for a complete lower extremity study). "Limited" means the examination did not encompass the full venous anatomy, regardless of whether one or both extremities were partially imaged. Evaluating only the proximal system (femoral and popliteal) without the tibials, or imaging only the superficial system (GSV) without the deep system, both qualify as limited studies [1].
Provider and setting context: 93971 is billed across radiology, vascular surgery, cardiology, and vascular lab (IDTF) settings. The code is a diagnostic imaging service (PC/TC = 1), so the professional and technical components are separately billable when performed in a split-bill environment. In a physician office that owns the equipment, the global code (no modifier) is billed. In a hospital outpatient department, the facility claims -TC and the interpreting physician claims -26 separately [5].
| Code | Description | When to Use Instead |
|---|---|---|
| 93971 | Duplex scan of extremity veins; unilateral or limited study | One limb fully evaluated, or either/both limbs partially evaluated |
| 93970 | Duplex scan of extremity veins; complete bilateral study | All major venous segments of both extremities fully evaluated on the same date |
| 93978 | Duplex scan of aorta, IVC, iliac vasculature; complete study | Proximal venous obstruction evaluation extending into central vessels |
| 93979 | Duplex scan of aorta, IVC, iliac vasculature; unilateral or limited study | Limited iliac or IVC evaluation, often paired when central obstruction is suspected |
| 93990 | Duplex scan of hemodialysis access | Post-creation AV fistula or graft surveillance; different anatomic target than native extremity veins |
The critical differentiator is completeness, not laterality. If both legs were scanned but only the proximal segments were imaged, 93971 (limited) is correct. 93970 requires documentation of every major venous segment in both limbs. Auditors flag 93970 claims that lack bilateral segment-by-segment findings, and those claims are vulnerable to downcoding to 93971.
flowchart TD
A[Extremity venous duplex performed] --> B{Both extremities\nimaged?}
B -- No --> C[93971\nUnilateral]
B -- Yes --> D{All major segments\ncomplete on both sides?}
D -- No --> E[93971\nLimited]
D -- Yes --> F[93970\nComplete bilateral]
Modifier usage:
MUE and units: The CMS MUE for 93971 is 1 unit per date of service [4]. Attempting to bill 93971-RT and 93971-LT on the same date for bilateral limited studies may conflict with this MUE. Some MACs permit bilateral limited reporting with laterality modifiers; verify MAC-specific policy before submitting dual units. When in doubt, query the MAC or escalate to the compliance team.
Multiple procedure reduction (TC): When 93971 is billed with other diagnostic cardiovascular ultrasound services on the same date, the TC of the lower-valued service reduces to 75% of the fee schedule. The professional component (-26) is not subject to this reduction [5].
Global period: Global days = XXX (concept does not apply). Each study is billed independently with no pre- or post-operative follow-up period included in the payment [5].
Required elements for a compliant 93971 report:
Audit red flags specific to this code:
Medical necessity: MAC LCDs for noninvasive vascular studies (e.g., Novitas LCD L33619 and equivalents) specify covered indications including acute DVT signs or symptoms, PE source workup, known DVT follow-up with documented clinical change, chronic venous insufficiency with objective findings, pre-procedural venous mapping, and catheter-associated thrombosis [2]. The diagnosis code submitted must reflect the clinical indication at the time of the order, not a confirmed DVT that had not yet been diagnosed when the study was ordered. For suspected DVT workups, a symptom code (e.g., R60.0 for localized edema) is appropriate until results confirm the diagnosis.
Medicare:
Multiple MACs maintain LCDs covering CPT 93971 under noninvasive vascular diagnostic studies policies [2]. Coverage is available for the clinical indications listed in the Documentation Essentials section. Routine or screening studies in asymptomatic patients without documented risk factors are not covered. Repeat studies require documented interval clinical change or a new clinical indication.
The 2025 Physician Fee Schedule conversion factor was $32.3465 before locality adjustment and legislative modification [6]. RVUs differ between facility (lower) and non-facility (higher) settings, reflecting the cost of equipment in a non-facility environment. Confirm current RVU values against the CMS PFS lookup tool.
93971 is not subject to a surgical global period (XXX indicator), is not payable in an ASC setting for diagnostic imaging (verify MAC policy), and the technical component is subject to the code 6 multiple procedure reduction when multiple cardiovascular diagnostic ultrasound TCs are billed on the same date [5].
Commercial payers:
Commercial policies generally follow Medicare coverage rationale for 93971 but may impose prior authorization requirements for non-emergency venous duplex, particularly for pre-procedural venous mapping and surveillance studies. Some payers require specific ICD-10-CM codes to appear on the claim (rather than symptom codes) to generate automatic coverage determination. Verify payer-specific diagnosis code lists before submitting claims for chronic venous insufficiency or varicose vein indications.
Upcoding denial: 93970 billed, 93971 payable The payer or MAC downcodes 93970 to 93971 when the clinical documentation does not support a complete bilateral study. This occurs when the report lacks bilateral segment documentation or when only one extremity was examined. Prevention: Code from the report, not the order. If the report documents one extremity, bill 93971 regardless of what was ordered.
Missing laterality modifier Claims submitted without -RT or -LT are rejected by MACs and commercial payers that require laterality identification on unilateral services. Prevention: Establish a billing workflow that requires laterality modifiers on all 93971 claims; treat the absence of a modifier as an edit that must be resolved before submission.
Medical necessity denial: insufficient clinical indication Payers deny claims when the submitted diagnosis code does not map to a covered indication in the applicable LCD, or when the diagnosis code selected does not reflect the documented clinical scenario (e.g., a confirmed DVT code submitted for a rule-out study, which may flag as retrospective diagnosis assignment). Prevention: Confirm that the ICD-10-CM code on the claim matches the indication documented at the time of the order. For suspected DVT, use symptom codes at ordering and update to confirmed diagnosis codes after results are available.
Bundling denial: 93971 billed with 93970 same date 93971 is a component of 93970; billing both codes for the same extremity type on the same date is an unbundling error [3]. Prevention: If a complete bilateral study was performed, bill 93970 only. Code 93971 is redundant and will be denied.
MUE denial: second unit on same date Submitting 93971-RT and 93971-LT on the same date may exceed the MUE of 1 unit [4]. Prevention: Verify MAC policy on bilateral limited studies reported with laterality modifiers before submitting dual units. Some MACs permit this; others do not. If denied, appeal with clinical documentation supporting the distinct clinical necessity for each limb evaluation.
Scenario 1: A 58-year-old woman with a recent hip replacement presents with left leg swelling and calf tenderness. The vascular lab performs a duplex scan of the left lower extremity, evaluating the common femoral, femoral, popliteal, and tibial veins with compression responses. The right leg is not examined.
Correct coding: 93971-LT + R60.0 (localized edema) at ordering; update to I82.402 (acute DVT, left lower extremity) once DVT is confirmed on the report.
Why: One extremity was fully examined. 93971 is the unilateral study code. 93970 is incorrect because the bilateral study was not performed.
Scenario 2: A patient with bilateral lower extremity DVT diagnosed three months prior returns for follow-up. Due to time constraints, the sonographer images only the bilateral femoral and popliteal veins; tibial veins are not evaluated on either side. The report documents proximal bilateral findings only.
Correct coding: 93971 (no laterality modifier, as both sides were partially imaged but study is limited) + I82.4Y3 (chronic DVT, proximal lower extremity, bilateral) or the appropriate chronic/acute equivalent.
Why: Both extremities were imaged but the study was limited to proximal segments. The examination was not complete on either side, making 93971 (limited) the correct code. 93970 requires all major venous segments on both sides.
Scenario 3: A hospital outpatient department performs a right lower extremity venous duplex for suspected DVT. The hospital employs a vascular sonographer who performs the scan; a radiologist from an independent radiology group interprets and signs the report.
Correct coding: Hospital submits 93971-TC-RT on the facility UB-04. Radiologist submits 93971-26-RT on the CMS-1500 professional claim.
Why: PC/TC indicator 1 permits component billing. Each entity bills only its component; neither bills the global code, which would duplicate payment.
Scenario 4: A patient with a PICC line in the right arm develops right arm swelling. A duplex scan evaluates the right basilic, brachial, axillary, and subclavian veins. Thrombus is identified in the right axillary vein.
Correct coding: 93971-RT + I82.A11 (acute embolism and thrombosis of right axillary vein).
Why: Upper extremity venous duplex falls within 93971 just as lower extremity studies do. The code is not limited to the lower extremity; laterality modifier -RT specifies the examined limb.
© Copyright 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
A duplex scan of extremity veins is a specialized vascular ultrasound procedure designed to assess the condition of veins in the arms and legs. This examination employs both B-mode imaging and Doppler ultrasound techniques to provide a comprehensive evaluation of venous structures. During the procedure, a clear gel is applied to the skin over the area of interest, which facilitates the transmission of sound waves. A B-mode transducer is then placed on the skin, generating real-time images of the veins as the transducer is moved across the targeted region. The Doppler component of the transducer is crucial as it measures the flow of blood within the veins, providing insights into the direction and velocity of blood flow. The B-mode imaging utilizes ultrasonic sound waves that penetrate the skin and reflect off the veins, creating visual representations of their structure. Meanwhile, the Doppler function emits sound waves that bounce off moving blood cells, allowing for the detection of flow patterns. These reflected sound waves are amplified, making them audible, and any changes in pitch can indicate variations in blood flow, such as reductions or complete obstructions. The data collected during the scan is processed by a computer, which generates color-coded images that illustrate blood flow dynamics and highlight any potential blockages. Additionally, the duplex scan may involve a baseline assessment followed by further evaluations using compression techniques or other maneuvers that can modify blood flow, enhancing the diagnostic capability of the study. After the examination, the physician interprets the results and documents their findings in a written report. For a complete bilateral study of the upper or lower extremity veins, the appropriate code to use is 93970, while code 93971 is designated for unilateral or limited studies.
© Copyright 2026 Coding Ahead. All rights reserved.
The duplex scan of extremity veins is indicated for various clinical scenarios where assessment of venous function and structure is necessary. The following conditions may warrant this procedure:
The duplex scan of extremity veins involves several key procedural steps to ensure accurate assessment of venous structures and blood flow. The following steps outline the process:
After the duplex scan of extremity veins, there are typically no specific post-procedure care requirements, as the procedure is non-invasive and does not involve any recovery time. Patients can generally resume their normal activities immediately following the examination. The physician will review the results and discuss any necessary follow-up actions or treatments based on the findings. It is important for patients to understand the significance of the results and any further evaluations or interventions that may be recommended.
| Short Descr | EXTREMITY STUDY | Medium Descr | DUP-SCAN XTR VEINS UNILATERAL/LIMITED STUDY | Long Descr | Duplex scan of extremity veins including responses to compression and other maneuvers; unilateral or limited study | Status Code | Active Code | Global Days | XXX - Global Concept Does Not Apply | PC/TC Indicator (26, TC) | 1 - Diagnostic Tests for Radiology Services | Multiple Procedures (51) | 6 - Special payment adjustment rules on the technical component (TC) of multiple diagnostic cardiovascular services apply... | Bilateral Surgery (50) | 0 - 150% payment adjustment for bilateral procedures does NOT apply. | Physician Supervisions | 09 - Concept does not apply. | Assistant Surgeon (80, 82) | 0 - Payment restriction for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure... | Co-Surgeons (62) | 0 - Co-surgeons not permitted for this procedure. | Team Surgery (66) | 0 - Team surgeons not permitted for this procedure. | Diagnostic Imaging Family | 99 - Concept Does Not Apply | APC Status Indicator | Procedure or Service, Not Discounted when Multiple | Type of Service (TOS) | 5 - Diagnostic Laboratory | Berenson-Eggers TOS (BETOS) | I3F - Echography/ultrasonography - other | MUE | 1 | CCS Clinical Classification | 197 - Other diagnostic ultrasound |
| 26 | Professional component: certain procedures are a combination of a physician or other qualified health care professional component and a technical component. when the physician or other qualified health care professional component is reported separately, the service may be identified by adding modifier 26 to the usual procedure number. | LT | Left side (used to identify procedures performed on the left side of the body) | RT | Right side (used to identify procedures performed on the right side of the body) | X5 | Diagnostic services requested by another clinician: for reporting services by a clinician who furnishes care to the patient only as requested by another clinician or subsequent and related services requested by another clinician; this modifier is reported for patient relationships that may not be adequately captured by the above alternative categories; reporting clinician service examples include but are not limited to, the radiologist's interpretation of an imaging study requested by another clinician | TC | Technical component; under certain circumstances, a charge may be made for the technical component alone; under those circumstances the technical component charge is identified by adding modifier 'tc' to the usual procedure number; technical component charges are institutional charges and not billed separately by physicians; however, portable x-ray suppliers only bill for technical component and should utilize modifier tc; the charge data from portable x-ray suppliers will then be used to build customary and prevailing profiles | 59 | Distinct procedural service: under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or independent from other non-e/m services performed on the same day. modifier 59 is used to identify procedures/services, other than e/m services, that are not normally reported together, but are appropriate under the circumstances. documentation must support a different session, different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision, separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual. however, when another already established modifier is appropriate it should be used rather than modifier 59. only if no more descriptive modifier is available, and the use of modifier 59 best explains the circumstances, should modifier 59 be used. note: modifier 59 should not be appended to an e/m service. to report a separate and distinct e/m service with a non-e/m service performed on the same date, see modifier 25. | GC | This service has been performed in part by a resident under the direction of a teaching physician | 51 | Multiple procedures: when multiple procedures, other than e/m services, physical medicine and rehabilitation services or provision of supplies (eg, vaccines), are performed at the same session by the same individual, the primary procedure or service may be reported as listed. the additional procedure(s) or service(s) may be identified by appending modifier 51 to the additional procedure or service code(s). note: this modifier should not be appended to designated "add-on" codes (see appendix d). | GA | Waiver of liability statement issued as required by payer policy, individual case | XS | Separate structure, a service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure | GW | Service not related to the hospice patient's terminal condition | Q6 | Service furnished under a fee-for-time compensation arrangement by a substitute physician or by a substitute physical therapist furnishing outpatient physical therapy services in a health professional shortage area, a medically underserved area, or a rural area | GZ | Item or service expected to be denied as not reasonable and necessary | AQ | Physician providing a service in an unlisted health professional shortage area (hpsa) | XU | Unusual non-overlapping service, the use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service | CR | Catastrophe/disaster related | XE | Separate encounter, a service that is distinct because it occurred during a separate encounter | 76 | Repeat procedure or service by same physician or other qualified health care professional: it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was repeated by the same physician or other qualified health care professional subsequent to the original procedure or service. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 76 to the repeated procedure or service. note: this modifier should not be appended to an e/m service. | Q5 | Service furnished under a reciprocal billing arrangement by a substitute physician or by a substitute physical therapist furnishing outpatient physical therapy services in a health professional shortage area, a medically underserved area, or a rural area | 58 | Staged or related procedure or service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during the postoperative period: it may be necessary to indicate that the performance of a procedure or service during the postoperative period was: (a) planned or anticipated (staged); (b) more extensive than the original procedure; or (c) for therapy following a surgical procedure. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 58 to the staged or related procedure. note: for treatment of a problem that requires a return to the operating/procedure room (eg, unanticipated clinical condition), see modifier 78. | 77 | Repeat procedure by another physician or other qualified health care professional: it may be necessary to indicate that a basic procedure or service was repeated by another physician or other qualified health care professional subsequent to the original procedure or service. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 77 to the repeated procedure or service. note: this modifier should not be appended to an e/m service. | 79 | Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during the postoperative period: the individual may need to indicate that the performance of a procedure or service during the postoperative period was unrelated to the original procedure. this circumstance may be reported by using modifier 79. (for repeat procedures on the same day, see modifier 76.) | MG | The order for this service does not have applicable appropriate use criteria in the qualified clinical decision support mechanism consulted by the ordering professional | X4 | Episodic/focused services: for reporting services by clinicians who provide focused care on particular types of treatment limited to a defined period and circumstance; the patient has a problem, acute or chronic, that will be treated with surgery, radiation, or some other type of generally time-limited intervention; reporting clinician service examples include but are not limited to, the orthopedic surgeon performing a knee replacement and seeing the patient through the postoperative period | 22 | Increased procedural services: when the work required to provide a service is substantially greater than typically required, it may be identified by adding modifier 22 to the usual procedure code. documentation must support the substantial additional work and the reason for the additional work (ie, increased intensity, time, technical difficulty of procedure, severity of patient's condition, physical and mental effort required). note: this modifier should not be appended to an e/m service. | 25 | Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional on the same day of the procedure or other service: it may be necessary to indicate that on the day a procedure or service identified by a cpt code was performed, the patient's condition required a significant, separately identifiable e/m service above and beyond the other service provided or beyond the usual preoperative and postoperative care associated with the procedure that was performed. a significant, separately identifiable e/m service is defined or substantiated by documentation that satisfies the relevant criteria for the respective e/m service to be reported (see evaluation and management services guidelines for instructions on determining level of e/m service). the e/m service may be prompted by the symptom or condition for which the procedure and/or service was provided. as such, different diagnoses are not required for reporting of the e/m services on the same date. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 25 to the appropriate level of e/m service. note: this modifier is not used to report an e/m service that resulted in a decision to perform surgery. see modifier 57 for significant, separately identifiable non-e/m services, see modifier 59. | 50 | Bilateral procedure: unless otherwise identified in the listings, bilateral procedures that are performed at the same session, should be identified by adding modifier 50 to the appropriate 5 digit code. note: this modifier should not be appended to designated "add-on" codes (see appendix d). | 52 | Reduced services: under certain circumstances a service or procedure is partially reduced or eliminated at the discretion of the physician or other qualified health care professional. under these circumstances the service provided can be identified by its usual procedure number and the addition of modifier 52, signifying that the service is reduced. this provides a means of reporting reduced services without disturbing the identification of the basic service. note: for hospital outpatient reporting of a previously scheduled procedure/service that is partially reduced or cancelled as a result of extenuating circumstances or those that threaten the well-being of the patient prior to or after administration of anesthesia, see modifiers 73 and 74 (see modifiers approved for asc hospital outpatient use). | 53 | Discontinued procedure: under certain circumstances, the physician or other qualified health care professional may elect to terminate a surgical or diagnostic procedure. due to extenuating circumstances or those that threaten the well being of the patient, it may be necessary to indicate that a surgical or diagnostic procedure was started but discontinued. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 53 to the code reported by the individual for the discontinued procedure. note: this modifier is not used to report the elective cancellation of a procedure prior to the patient's anesthesia induction and/or surgical preparation in the operating suite. for outpatient hospital/ambulatory surgery center (asc) reporting of a previously scheduled procedure/service that is partially reduced or cancelled as a result of extenuating circumstances or those that threaten the well being of the patient prior to or after administration of anesthesia, see modifiers 73 and 74 (see modifiers approved for asc hospital outpatient use). | 95 | Synchronous telemedicine service rendered via a real-time interactive audio and video telecommunications system: synchronous telemedicine service is defined as a real-time interaction between a physician or other qualified health care professional and a patient who is located at a distant site from the physician or other qualified health care professional. the totality of the communication of information exchanged between the physician or other qualified health care professional and the patient during the course of the synchronous telemedicine service must be of an amount and nature that would be sufficient to meet the key components and/or requirements of the same service when rendered via a face-to-face interaction. modifier 95 may only be appended to the services listed in appendix p. appendix p is the list of cpt codes for services that are typically performed face-to-face, but may be rendered via a real-time (synchronous) interactive audio and video telecommunications system. | AG | Primary physician | AM | Physician, team member service | CA | Procedure payable only in the inpatient setting when performed emergently on an outpatient who expires prior to admission | CC | Procedure code change (use 'cc' when the procedure code submitted was changed either for administrative reasons or because an incorrect code was filed) | ET | Emergency services | FS | Split (or shared) evaluation and management visit | GQ | Via asynchronous telecommunications system | GV | Attending physician not employed or paid under arrangement by the patient's hospice provider | GX | Notice of liability issued, voluntary under payer policy | GY | Item or service statutorily excluded, does not meet the definition of any medicare benefit or, for non-medicare insurers, is not a contract benefit | HH | Integrated mental health/substance abuse program | KT | Beneficiary resides in a competitive bidding area and travels outside that competitive bidding area and receives a competitive bid item | KX | Requirements specified in the medical policy have been met | MA | Ordering professional is not required to consult a clinical decision support mechanism due to service being rendered to a patient with a suspected or confirmed emergency medical condition | MH | Unknown if ordering professional consulted a clinical decision support mechanism for this service, related information was not provided to the furnishing professional or provider | PD | Diagnostic or related non diagnostic item or service provided in a wholly owned or operated entity to a patient who is admitted as an inpatient within 3 days | PN | Non-excepted service provided at an off-campus, outpatient, provider-based department of a hospital | Q0 | Investigational clinical service provided in a clinical research study that is in an approved clinical research study | Q1 | Routine clinical service provided in a clinical research study that is in an approved clinical research study | Q3 | Live kidney donor surgery and related services | QJ | Services/items provided to a prisoner or patient in state or local custody, however the state or local government, as applicable, meets the requirements in 42 cfr 411.4 (b) | QP | Documentation is on file showing that the laboratory test(s) was ordered individually or ordered as a cpt-recognized panel other than automated profile codes 80002-80019, g0058, g0059, and g0060. | SA | Nurse practitioner rendering service in collaboration with a physician | T1 | Left foot, second digit | TR | School-based individualized education program (iep) services provided outside the public school district responsible for the student | U2 | Medicaid level of care 2, as defined by each state | U6 | Medicaid level of care 6, as defined by each state | X1 | Continuous/broad services: for reporting services by clinicians, who provide the principal care for a patient, with no planned endpoint of the relationship; services in this category represent comprehensive care, dealing with the entire scope of patient problems, either directly or in a care coordination role; reporting clinician service examples include, but are not limited to: primary care, and clinicians providing comprehensive care to patients in addition to specialty care | X3 | Episodic/broad services: for reporting services by clinicians who have broad responsibility for the comprehensive needs of the patient that is limited to a defined period and circumstance such as a hospitalization; reporting clinician service examples include but are not limited to the hospitalist's services rendered providing comprehensive and general care to a patient while admitted to the hospital | XP | Separate practitioner, a service that is distinct because it was performed by a different practitioner |
|
Date
|
Action
|
Notes
|
|---|---|---|
| 1992-01-01 | Added | First appearance in code book in 1992. |
Get instant expert-level medical coding assistance.