Clinical indications driving 93971 include any scenario where venous evaluation of an extremity is clinically warranted but the scope does not constitute a complete bilateral study. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria (2023) rates duplex ultrasound as "Usually Appropriate" as the first-line modality for suspected lower-extremity DVT [7]. Common clinical triggers:
Scope boundaries define both uses of the code. "Unilateral" means a complete evaluation of one limb: all relevant venous segments for that extremity type (e.g., CFV, femoral, popliteal, GSV, tibials for a complete lower extremity study). "Limited" means the examination did not encompass the full venous anatomy, regardless of whether one or both extremities were partially imaged. Evaluating only the proximal system (femoral and popliteal) without the tibials, or imaging only the superficial system (GSV) without the deep system, both qualify as limited studies [1].
Provider and setting context: 93971 is billed across radiology, vascular surgery, cardiology, and vascular lab (IDTF) settings. The code is a diagnostic imaging service (PC/TC = 1), so the professional and technical components are separately billable when performed in a split-bill environment. In a physician office that owns the equipment, the global code (no modifier) is billed. In a hospital outpatient department, the facility claims -TC and the interpreting physician claims -26 separately [5].
| Code | Description | When to Use Instead |
|---|---|---|
| 93971 | Duplex scan of extremity veins; unilateral or limited study | One limb fully evaluated, or either/both limbs partially evaluated |
| 93970 | Duplex scan of extremity veins; complete bilateral study | All major venous segments of both extremities fully evaluated on the same date |
| 93978 | Duplex scan of aorta, IVC, iliac vasculature; complete study | Proximal venous obstruction evaluation extending into central vessels |
| 93979 | Duplex scan of aorta, IVC, iliac vasculature; unilateral or limited study | Limited iliac or IVC evaluation, often paired when central obstruction is suspected |
| 93990 | Duplex scan of hemodialysis access | Post-creation AV fistula or graft surveillance; different anatomic target than native extremity veins |
The critical differentiator is completeness, not laterality. If both legs were scanned but only the proximal segments were imaged, 93971 (limited) is correct. 93970 requires documentation of every major venous segment in both limbs. Auditors flag 93970 claims that lack bilateral segment-by-segment findings, and those claims are vulnerable to downcoding to 93971.
flowchart TD
A[Extremity venous duplex performed] --> B{Both extremities\nimaged?}
B -- No --> C[93971\nUnilateral]
B -- Yes --> D{All major segments\ncomplete on both sides?}
D -- No --> E[93971\nLimited]
D -- Yes --> F[93970\nComplete bilateral]
Modifier usage:
MUE and units: The CMS MUE for 93971 is 1 unit per date of service [4]. Attempting to bill 93971-RT and 93971-LT on the same date for bilateral limited studies may conflict with this MUE. Some MACs permit bilateral limited reporting with laterality modifiers; verify MAC-specific policy before submitting dual units. When in doubt, query the MAC or escalate to the compliance team.
Multiple procedure reduction (TC): When 93971 is billed with other diagnostic cardiovascular ultrasound services on the same date, the TC of the lower-valued service reduces to 75% of the fee schedule. The professional component (-26) is not subject to this reduction [5].
Global period: Global days = XXX (concept does not apply). Each study is billed independently with no pre- or post-operative follow-up period included in the payment [5].
Required elements for a compliant 93971 report:
Audit red flags specific to this code:
Medical necessity: MAC LCDs for noninvasive vascular studies (e.g., Novitas LCD L33619 and equivalents) specify covered indications including acute DVT signs or symptoms, PE source workup, known DVT follow-up with documented clinical change, chronic venous insufficiency with objective findings, pre-procedural venous mapping, and catheter-associated thrombosis [2]. The diagnosis code submitted must reflect the clinical indication at the time of the order, not a confirmed DVT that had not yet been diagnosed when the study was ordered. For suspected DVT workups, a symptom code (e.g., R60.0 for localized edema) is appropriate until results confirm the diagnosis.
Medicare:
Multiple MACs maintain LCDs covering CPT 93971 under noninvasive vascular diagnostic studies policies [2]. Coverage is available for the clinical indications listed in the Documentation Essentials section. Routine or screening studies in asymptomatic patients without documented risk factors are not covered. Repeat studies require documented interval clinical change or a new clinical indication.
The 2025 Physician Fee Schedule conversion factor was $32.3465 before locality adjustment and legislative modification [6]. RVUs differ between facility (lower) and non-facility (higher) settings, reflecting the cost of equipment in a non-facility environment. Confirm current RVU values against the CMS PFS lookup tool.
93971 is not subject to a surgical global period (XXX indicator), is not payable in an ASC setting for diagnostic imaging (verify MAC policy), and the technical component is subject to the code 6 multiple procedure reduction when multiple cardiovascular diagnostic ultrasound TCs are billed on the same date [5].
Commercial payers:
Commercial policies generally follow Medicare coverage rationale for 93971 but may impose prior authorization requirements for non-emergency venous duplex, particularly for pre-procedural venous mapping and surveillance studies. Some payers require specific ICD-10-CM codes to appear on the claim (rather than symptom codes) to generate automatic coverage determination. Verify payer-specific diagnosis code lists before submitting claims for chronic venous insufficiency or varicose vein indications.
Upcoding denial: 93970 billed, 93971 payable The payer or MAC downcodes 93970 to 93971 when the clinical documentation does not support a complete bilateral study. This occurs when the report lacks bilateral segment documentation or when only one extremity was examined. Prevention: Code from the report, not the order. If the report documents one extremity, bill 93971 regardless of what was ordered.
Missing laterality modifier Claims submitted without -RT or -LT are rejected by MACs and commercial payers that require laterality identification on unilateral services. Prevention: Establish a billing workflow that requires laterality modifiers on all 93971 claims; treat the absence of a modifier as an edit that must be resolved before submission.
Medical necessity denial: insufficient clinical indication Payers deny claims when the submitted diagnosis code does not map to a covered indication in the applicable LCD, or when the diagnosis code selected does not reflect the documented clinical scenario (e.g., a confirmed DVT code submitted for a rule-out study, which may flag as retrospective diagnosis assignment). Prevention: Confirm that the ICD-10-CM code on the claim matches the indication documented at the time of the order. For suspected DVT, use symptom codes at ordering and update to confirmed diagnosis codes after results are available.
Bundling denial: 93971 billed with 93970 same date 93971 is a component of 93970; billing both codes for the same extremity type on the same date is an unbundling error [3]. Prevention: If a complete bilateral study was performed, bill 93970 only. Code 93971 is redundant and will be denied.
MUE denial: second unit on same date Submitting 93971-RT and 93971-LT on the same date may exceed the MUE of 1 unit [4]. Prevention: Verify MAC policy on bilateral limited studies reported with laterality modifiers before submitting dual units. Some MACs permit this; others do not. If denied, appeal with clinical documentation supporting the distinct clinical necessity for each limb evaluation.
Scenario 1: A 58-year-old woman with a recent hip replacement presents with left leg swelling and calf tenderness. The vascular lab performs a duplex scan of the left lower extremity, evaluating the common femoral, femoral, popliteal, and tibial veins with compression responses. The right leg is not examined.
Correct coding: 93971-LT + R60.0 (localized edema) at ordering; update to I82.402 (acute DVT, left lower extremity) once DVT is confirmed on the report.
Why: One extremity was fully examined. 93971 is the unilateral study code. 93970 is incorrect because the bilateral study was not performed.
Scenario 2: A patient with bilateral lower extremity DVT diagnosed three months prior returns for follow-up. Due to time constraints, the sonographer images only the bilateral femoral and popliteal veins; tibial veins are not evaluated on either side. The report documents proximal bilateral findings only.
Correct coding: 93971 (no laterality modifier, as both sides were partially imaged but study is limited) + I82.4Y3 (chronic DVT, proximal lower extremity, bilateral) or the appropriate chronic/acute equivalent.
Why: Both extremities were imaged but the study was limited to proximal segments. The examination was not complete on either side, making 93971 (limited) the correct code. 93970 requires all major venous segments on both sides.
Scenario 3: A hospital outpatient department performs a right lower extremity venous duplex for suspected DVT. The hospital employs a vascular sonographer who performs the scan; a radiologist from an independent radiology group interprets and signs the report.
Correct coding: Hospital submits 93971-TC-RT on the facility UB-04. Radiologist submits 93971-26-RT on the CMS-1500 professional claim.
Why: PC/TC indicator 1 permits component billing. Each entity bills only its component; neither bills the global code, which would duplicate payment.
Scenario 4: A patient with a PICC line in the right arm develops right arm swelling. A duplex scan evaluates the right basilic, brachial, axillary, and subclavian veins. Thrombus is identified in the right axillary vein.
Correct coding: 93971-RT + I82.A11 (acute embolism and thrombosis of right axillary vein).
Why: Upper extremity venous duplex falls within 93971 just as lower extremity studies do. The code is not limited to the lower extremity; laterality modifier -RT specifies the examined limb.
© Copyright 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
A duplex scan of extremity veins is a specialized vascular ultrasound procedure designed to assess the condition of veins in the arms and legs. This examination employs both B-mode imaging and Doppler ultrasound techniques to provide a comprehensive evaluation of venous structures. During the procedure, a clear gel is applied to the skin over the area of interest, which facilitates the transmission of sound waves. A B-mode transducer is then placed on the skin, generating real-time images of the veins as the transducer is moved across the targeted region. The Doppler component of the transducer is crucial as it measures the flow of blood within the veins, providing insights into the direction and velocity of blood flow. The B-mode imaging utilizes ultrasonic sound waves that penetrate the skin and reflect off the veins, creating visual representations of their structure. Meanwhile, the Doppler function emits sound waves that bounce off moving blood cells, allowing for the detection of flow patterns. These reflected sound waves are amplified, making them audible, and any changes in pitch can indicate variations in blood flow, such as reductions or complete obstructions. The data collected during the scan is processed by a computer, which generates color-coded images that illustrate blood flow dynamics and highlight any potential blockages. Additionally, the duplex scan may involve a baseline assessment followed by further evaluations using compression techniques or other maneuvers that can modify blood flow, enhancing the diagnostic capability of the study. After the examination, the physician interprets the results and documents their findings in a written report. For a complete bilateral study of the upper or lower extremity veins, the appropriate code to use is 93970, while code 93971 is designated for unilateral or limited studies.
© Copyright 2026 Coding Ahead. All rights reserved.
Get instant expert-level answers from CasePilot, our coding assistant.
Create a free account to unlock this content
Create a free account to unlock this content
Create a free account to unlock this content
Create a free account to unlock this content
Create a free account to unlock this content
Create a free account to unlock this content
Get instant expert-level medical coding assistance.